Abdel Azim, S., Abdullah, A., Salem, A., Ibrahim, H. (2021). Assessment of Climate Changes Effectiveness on Floristic Diversity of Riparian Plants in The Area of the First Cataract Islands (Suluga and Gezel protected area) - River Nile, Upper Egypt. Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches, 11(2), 341-363. doi: 10.21608/jesr.2021.244289
Shazely A.M. Abdel Azim; Adel Abdullah; Ashraf H.I. Salem; Hazem H. Ibrahim. "Assessment of Climate Changes Effectiveness on Floristic Diversity of Riparian Plants in The Area of the First Cataract Islands (Suluga and Gezel protected area) - River Nile, Upper Egypt". Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches, 11, 2, 2021, 341-363. doi: 10.21608/jesr.2021.244289
Abdel Azim, S., Abdullah, A., Salem, A., Ibrahim, H. (2021). 'Assessment of Climate Changes Effectiveness on Floristic Diversity of Riparian Plants in The Area of the First Cataract Islands (Suluga and Gezel protected area) - River Nile, Upper Egypt', Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches, 11(2), pp. 341-363. doi: 10.21608/jesr.2021.244289
Abdel Azim, S., Abdullah, A., Salem, A., Ibrahim, H. Assessment of Climate Changes Effectiveness on Floristic Diversity of Riparian Plants in The Area of the First Cataract Islands (Suluga and Gezel protected area) - River Nile, Upper Egypt. Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches, 2021; 11(2): 341-363. doi: 10.21608/jesr.2021.244289
Assessment of Climate Changes Effectiveness on Floristic Diversity of Riparian Plants in The Area of the First Cataract Islands (Suluga and Gezel protected area) - River Nile, Upper Egypt
1Environmental Studies& Researches Institute University of Sadat City
2Nature conservation sector - Ministry of Environment
Abstract
The vegetation of Suluga and Gezel PA represents relicts of the original Nubian Riverain Vegetation, a semi-arid scrub and grassland, which have successfully survived up to the present, particularly after the construction of the Aswan old and High Dams. 112 species, representing 23 orders, 37 families and 90 genera; 29 families are Dicotyledonoae (78.4 %) with 76 species, and 7 families are Monocotyledonous (21.6%) with 36 species (32.1 %). In accordance to flora of the studied islands as a whole, 64 annuals (57.1%) and 48 perennials (42.9%). With regards to most represented families are Poaceae has the highest contribution to the total flora (24 species: 21.4%), followed by Fabaceae (17 species15.2%), Asteraceae (12 species: 10.7%). The vegetation life form spectrum of Suluga and Gezel islands reflects a typical desert flora, the greater part of species are therophytes and phanerophytes (70.5%). The phytogeographical analysis of the 112 plant species surveyed in this study revealed that the Palaeotropical have the highest contribution (26 species: 23.2%) followed by the Cosmopolitan (19 species: 17%) and Pantropical (18 species: 16.1%). The monoregional represented by (22 species: 19.6%) of which 19 species were Sudano-Zambezian, 2 species Mediterranean and one species Saharo-Sindian. The bi-regional chorotype was represented by 21 species (18.8% of the total flora) of which 8 species (7.1%) Saharo-Sindian and Sudano-Zambezian, 7 species (6.3%) belonging to Sudano-Zambezian and Saharo-Sindian, 3 species (2.7%) belonging to Mediterranean-Irano-Turanian chorotype, 2 species (1.8) were belonging to Sudano-Zambezian and Mediterranean and only one species (0.9%) belonging to Mediterranean and Sudano-Zambezian chorotype. Pluriregional represented by 6 species (5.4%). Species richness, Shannon-Weiner H, and Margalef indices measurements indicated that shoreline and islands banks are the most diverse habitat and followed by “mosaic pattern of vegetation” in which plant aggregates grow together forming complex stands. These results indicate that altitudinal gradient, habitat types and edaphic conditions that control soil moisture have significant influences on species diversity. Comparative analysis and long term analysis indicated that + 28 species (+20 %) were lost or may be extremely very rare within 40 years. This could be due to severe environmental conditions, climate changes and Human interface in the present study area.
However, nature reserves are considered as a successful way to conserve the vegetation cover, especially in arid regions and extremely arid ecosystems. This helps to combat desertification, which is a product of land use and climate change. Hence, there is good reason for the selection of nature reserve in an arid region, Suluga and Gezel protected area (±0.5 square kilometers) in the extremely south desert to study the effects of climate change on this type of fragile ecosystem. It is expected that the impact of climate change on ecosystems will alter abundance and distribution of species (Parmesan 2006), direct loss of some species and populations and habitat loss (Walther et al. 2002; Thomas et al. 2004), as well as gradual or rapid depletion and decline of the services that these offer. In Egypt, the Nile extends for about 1200 km from Aswan at the south to the Mediterranean coast at the north. A large number of islands that differ in size and age exist in the part of the River Nile that lies within the Egyptian territories. During the French Campaign (1798-1801), these islands were counted to be 215. At the beginning of the 20th century. The Nile at Aswan located at (24° 05ʹ N, 32° 55ʹ E) is interrupted by about 30 islands varying in size and structure. Twelve of them are protected islands. Most of them are granite. Islands are dominant landforms of pristine alluvial rivers. Because islands integrate hydrologic, morphologic and vegetation attributes, the presence of various succession stages of islands provides a landscape-level indicator of the condition of river corridors (Ward et al. 2002). The diversity of species on islands impacted by climatic changes as well as human activities such as cultivation, urbanization and introduction of burning, medicinal plant collection, cutting…. etc.
The igneous granite (basement complex) islands mainly located at the First Cataract area (Abu Al-ezz 1971). Before the construction of the old Aswan Dam in 1902 and the Aswan High Dam in the 1960s, most of the First Cataract Islands were intermittently under water. However, now most of them are permanently exposed with loamy-sand deposits between them. The islands of the First Cataract of the Nile River, such as Bigeh, Philae and Agilkia in the Aswan Reservoir, were the fortification controlled the access to ancient Upper Egypt and Nubia. These igneous islands of the First Cataract area are the most ancient archaeological sites in the River Nile and this is a World Heritage Site. These islands are among the oldest known islands, support unique assemblages of native species characteristic of the aquatic life in the River Nile (El-Hadidi and Springuel, 1978and 1981 1990). Suluga and Gezel are two of the First Cataract Islands that were declared a conservation area by the Prime Minister’s Decree under Law No. 928 in 1986 and has had Protected status since then within the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency. According to Springuel (1981) a total of 94 species of angiosperms belongings to 34 families were recorded from the first cataract islands. The vegetation of these islands is heterogeneous.
Springuel (1981) indicates that definite changes in plant distribution in the area of the First Cataract Islands are associated with the increasing depth of soil deposits due to the sedimentation of fine material suspended in water. According to the Bioclimatic Map of the Mediterranean Zone (1963), the study area is in a true desert climate. The rainfall of this area is not only scanty, but also extremely irregular and variable (Kassas 1955). The First Cataract Islands are characterized by shallow water of low current velocity and support rich floristic diversity (Ali et al. 1999). The present study aimed to assessing of climate changes effectiveness on floristic diversity of riparian plants in the area of the First Cataract islands (Suluga and Gezel Protected area) and at what degree these vegetation communities affected also by the human interface, this study deal with the long term vegetation changes.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
One hundred and twenty two sites selected to represent the locations within Suluga and Gezel Reserve. The sites were selected to represent a wide range of physiographic and environmental variation in each in the present study area. This study Conducted during the period from the November 2018 to December 2020.Vegetation sampling was carried out using the réléve method described by Müller-Dombois and Ellenberg (1974). The size of each site was determined according to the certain parameters such as width of each area, the variation in density and size of species, species identified and recorded and as well as the soil variation. Species were identified after Tackholm 1974, Boulos 1999, 2000 and 2002 and 2005 Species life forms were determined depending upon the location of the regenerative buds and the shed parts during the unfavorable season (Raunkier 1934).
Soil samples were collected from each stand. Sizes of soil particles were estimated using the pipette method (Kilmer and Alexander 1949. Soil water extracts (1:5) were prepared for determination of EC and pH using conductivity and pH meters, chlorides by direct titration against silver nitrate using potassium chromate as an indicator, carbonates and bicarbonates by direct titration against HCl using phenolphthalein and methyl orange as indicators, calcium and magnesium by titration against EDTA (ethylenediamine dihydrogen tetraacetic acid) using ammonium purpurate and eriochrome black T as indicators (Jackson1977). Two-way indicator species analysis (Twinspan), as a classification technique and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) as an ordination technique, were applied to the presence estimates of 112 species in 122 vegetation site according to the computer programs of HILL (1979 a, b). The relationship between the vegetation and edaphic variables were assessed by calculating the simple linear correlation coefficient (r) between the DCA axes (reflect the vegetation gradient) and the soil variables. Comparison analysis carried out between present and past species list recorded in the present study area Springuel et al. (1981), (Hamada (2004) and other recorded reports and published papers Up to date. Global geographical distributions of the recorded species were gathered from Zohary (1972), Boulos (1995, 1999, 2000 and 2005).
Species diversity in the present study area was calculated using a Biodiversity (PAST software in which the Shannon’s index (H') was chosen (eq.1). This method was selected because it provides an account for both abundance and evenness (Magurran 1988). The Shannon’s index ranges typically from 1.5 to 3.5 and rarely reaches 4.5 (Gaines et al. 1999). In addition, the Simpson index (D) and the evenness index (E=Evenness) are considered as a measure of species dominances and a measure for evenness of spread, respectively (Magurran 1988). Eq. 2. Species evenness is often assessed by Shannon's equitability index (H'E) which is calculated by eq. 3. The Jaccard’s index (Krebs 1989) was used to calculate the species similarities between the vegetation types in different vegetation fragments eq. 4. Species richness was calculated as the total number of species per site and vegetation cluster. Species turnover (beta diversity) was calculated using 1-Jaccard’s index of similarity since it provides a way to measure the species turnover between different areas (Magurran 1988). The calculation of the index has been designed to equal 1 in cases of complete similarities. 5. Plant- diversity as species turnover between individual sites, vegetation cluster was assessed using Whittaker's index eq.6. Similarity was estimated between any two vegetation cluster and the selected rich areas vegetation, using the Sorensen’s coefficient (Sorensen’s 1948), based on a binary presence -absence of species and sites eq.7
Eq. 1.
Eq. 2.
H ' E = H ' / H max
Eq. 3.
Ci = a / + b + c
Eq. 4.
Eq. 5.
Eq. 6.
S = 2W/ (a + b)
Eq. 7.
2.2. Study area
The Nile at Aswan (24° 05’ N, 32° 55’ E) is interrupted by about 30 islands varying in size and structure, where the river is deflected westwards and the current becomes stronger, indicating the real beginning of the First Cataract. Before the construction of the old Aswan Dam in 1902 and the Aswan High Dam in the 1960s, most of the First Cataract Islands were intermittently under water. However, now most of them are permanently exposed with loamy-sand deposits between them. These granite islands, among the oldest known islands, support unique assemblages of native species characteristic of the aquatic life in the River Nile (El-Hadidi and Springuel 1978).
2.2. Island description
"Suluga Island” which is about ±1160 m long and varies from ±50 up to±540 m. The central and southern parts of old high granite rocks are barren and plant growth is confined to the narrow silt terraces on the east-west banks of the larger islands Suluga. The present study habitat area represents the high rocks in the southern part of Gezel Island or in the central parts of (Suluga I). These granite rocks, which are different in size and height, are the base for deposits of soil-forming material brought by the river water behind them. The biggest rocks, which form the core of the islands Suluga a height of up to 30 meters. Usually rocks higher than 20 meters are bare, without vegetation cover. A very thin layer of soil is wind-borne and accumulates in the cracks between the rocks. It mostly consists soft material, which is a mixture of fine and coarse sand. The process of the weathering of rocks also takes part in the formation of soil. The remains of plants promote the accumulation of organic matter in the soil. Again, the water supply is very poor. The main reason for this is that the soil has no contact with the river water, due to the granite bedrock. The soil is supplied with water only by precipitation, which happens once in many years, and from the condensation of water due to the large fluctuation in day and night temperatures (Springuel 1981). The "Gezel Island which is about 850 m long and varies from ±160 to±260 m broad. The general cross-section of the southern rocky part of the island along. Illustrated that, Phragmites australis is a dominant on the partly submerged land and Salix, together with Mimosa pigra, are associated species. The high rocks, 6m above the water level, are bare except for a few individuals of Tamarix, and Imperata cylindrica, which grow in the cracks of the rocks. The narrow strip of silt deposit, 3 m above the water level, is occupied by Tamarix and on the low part of the steep slope panicum and cynodon is present. The partly submerged and is occupied by polygonum and other aquatic vegetation (Fig.1).
The climate of the South Eastern Desert of Egypt is extremely arid (Ayyad and Ghabbour 1986), with an aridity index of less than 0.05. A mean minimum temperature of 8.1 ºC has been recorded in January 1960; On the other hand, the mean maximum temperature of 41.8 ºC has been recorded in July, which can often reach above 45 ºC especially in August (Wadi Allaqi Metereological Station: August 1997). On the other hand, the long term monthly mean relative humidity (1960 to 1980) ranged between 14.0 and 38%, while the annual mean was 22.7%, monthly mean relative humidity (1960 to 1980) ranged between 14.0 and 38%, while the annual mean was 22.7%. Regarding the annual variation, it varies from 38.4 in 1996 to 52.3 % in 2005. The wind speed at Aswan ranged between 4 to 8 km h-1 between 1960 and 1980 with an annual mean wind speed of 5.9 km h-1. In contrast, the mean annual wind speed in Wadi Allaqi meteorological station ranged between 7.6 and 10.1 km h-1 from 1996 to 2005 (Springuel and Belal 1996). The water evaporation from 1960 to 2010 ranged between 10.5 and 26.7 (picha) on the other hand, with a mean annual of 18.5 mm day-1 picha (Zahran and Willis 1992).
Figure 1: General map of the study area of the first cataract islands (Suluga and Gezel) at Aswan.
3. RESULTS
Sites classification according to TWINSPAN led to the identification of 13 clusters of sites similar in terms of their species composition (Fig 2); they are named after the dominant species as follows: Panicum coloratum. Acacia tortilis subsp. raddiana and Acacia seyal. Juncus rigidus. Fimbristylis bisumbellata. Amaranthus viridis. Mimosa pigra, and Leptadenia arborea,Acacia nilotica, Crypsis schoenoides Mimosa pigra, Amaranthus graecizans, Phoenix dactylifera, Sesbania sesban and Hyphaene thebaica. Phragmites australis, Ziziphus spina-christi, Faidherbia albida, Cynodon dactylon, Cyperus rotundus, Eragrostis cilianensis, Panicum repens and Persicaria senegalensis One Hundred and twelve species were recorded along the different sites of the catchment area of Suluga and Gezel region: 64 annuals (57.1%) and 48 perennials (42.9%). These species belong to 37 families and 90 genera (Table. 2). The Family Poaceae has the highest contribution to the total flora (24 species: 21.4%), followed by Fabaceae (17 species15.2%), Asteraceae (12 species: 10.7%), Amaranthaeeae (5 species: 4.5%), Cyperaceae (5 species: 4.5%) and Solanaceae, (4 species: 3.6%), Convolvulaceae (4 species: 3.6%), Euphorbiaceae, Brassicaeeae, Malvaceae, and Apoeynaceae each of (3 species: 2.7%, see table 1 and fig. 3).
Figure 2: Dendrogram indicating the thirteen vegetation clusters (I- XIII) resulting from the TWINSPAN classification of the 122 sampled vegetation sites in Suluga and Gezel PA.
Table 1: List of the recorded plant species in area of the First cataract island (Suluga and Gezel protected area) area along with their families, life span, life form and chorotypes, presence value (P %) of the Floristic composition of the vegetation clusters (I-XIII) and Dis : vegetation Abundance.
Family
Species
Chorotype
Life form
Life span
Dis
P%
I :Dicotyledonoae
Cerarophyllaeeae
Ceratophyllmn demersum L.
COSM
Hydrophyte
Preinnal
cc
9.0
Haloragaceae
Myriophyllum spicalam L.
PAL
Hydrophyte
Preinnal
rr
4.1
Amaranthaeeae
Alternanthera sessilis (L.) DC.
PAN
Therophyte
annual
c
3.3
Amaranthus graecizans L. subsp. thellungiam's (Nevski).
Oxystelma esculentum (L. f.) R.Br. var.alpini(Decne.)N. E. Br.
S-Z
Phanerophyte
perennial
c
0.8
Rubiaceae
Oldenlandia capensis L. var. Capensis
PAL
Therophyte
annual
r
0.8
Boraginaceae
Heliotropium ovalifolium Forssk.
PAL
Therophyte
annual
r
6.6
Heliotropium supinum L.
S-Z+ME
Therophyte
annual
c
4.9
Convolvulaceae
Convolvulus arvensis L.
PAL
Hemicryptophyte
perennial
cc
4.1
Cuscuta pedicellata Ledeb.
ME+ S-Z
Parasite
annual
cc
4.9
Ipomoea cairica (L.) Sweet.
PAL
Geophyte
Perennial
cc
0.8
Ipomoea eriocarpa R. BR.
PAN
Therophyte
annual
c
2.5
Solanaceae
Datura innoxia Mill.
PAN
Therophyte
annual
c
1.6
Physalis angulata L.
PAN
Therophyte
annual
r
0.8
Solanum nigrum L.
COSM
Therophyte
annual
cc
10.7
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal.
SA – SI + S – Z
Chamaephyte
annual
r
1.6
Lamiaceae
Lamium amplexicaule L.
COSM
Therophyte
annual
cc
0.8
Scrophulariaceae
Veronica enagallis-aquatica L.
COSM
Geophyte/
Hydrophyte
Perennial
cc
1.6
Apiaceae
Ammi majus L.
ME
Therophyte
annual
cc
0.8
Asteraceae
Bidens pilosa L.
PAN
Therophyte
annual
cc
2.5
Conyza aegyptiaca (L.) Dryand
S – Z
Therophyte
annual
cc
6.6
Eclipta prostrate (L.) L.
PAN
Therophyte
annual
cc
4.1
Phiehea dioscoridis (L.) DC.
SA – SI + S – Z
Phanerophyte
annual
cc
2.5
Pseudococyza viscose (Mill) D'Arcy
PAL
Therophyte
annual
r
2.5
Pseudognaphalium luteo album L.
COSM
Therophyte
annual
cc
2.5
Pulicaria undulata (L.) C.A May.
SA – SI + S – Z
Chamaephyte
Perennial
cc
5.7
Senecio aegyptius L.var. aegyptius
S-Z
Therophyte
annual
c
4.9
Senecio aegyptius L. var.discoideus Boiss.
S-Z
Therophyte
annual
c
4.9
Sonchus oleraceus L.
COSM
Therophyte
annual
cc
6.6
Symphyotricum squamatum (Spreng) Nesom.
PAN
Chamaephyte
annual
cwn
3.3
Xanthium strumarium L.
PAL
Therophyte
annual
c
13.9
II-Monocotyledoneae
Araceae
Lemna gibba L.
COSM
Hydrophyte
annual
cc
0.8
Potamogetonaceae
Potamogeton crispus L.
COSM
Hydrophyte
Perennial
cc
3.3
Arecaceae
Hyphaene thebaica (L.) Mart.
S-Z
Phanerophyte
Perennial
c
2.5
Phoenix dactylifera L.
SA-SI+S-Z
Phanerophyte
Perennial
cc
4.1
Cyperaceae
Cyperus alopecuroides Rottb.
PAN
Geophyte
/Hydrophyte
annual
cc
4.9
Cyperus difformis L.
PAN
Geophyte
Perennial
c
2.5
Cyperus michelianus (L.) Delile
PAL
Therophyte
annual
c
4.9
Cyperus rotundus L.
PAN
Geophyte
Perennial
cc
2.5
Fimbristylis bisumbellata (Forssk.) Bubani
PAL
Therophyte
annual
cc
9.0
Juncaceae
Juncus rigidus Desf.
ME+IR-TR+SA-SI
Geophyte
Perennial
rr
5.7
Poaceae
Cenchrus biflorus Roxb.
PAL
Therophyte
annual
rr
1.6
Chloris pycnothrix Trin.
S-Z
Therophyte
annual
rr
0.8
Cnloris virgata Sw.
PAL
Therophyte
annual
r
0.8
Crypsis schoenoides (L.) Lam.
COSM
Therophyte
annual
c
6.6
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.
PAN
Geophyte
Perennial
cc
12.3
Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.)Willd.
PAL
Therophyte
Perennial
cc
3.3
Desmostachya bipinnata (L.)Stapf
SA-SI+S-Z
Geophyte
Perennial
cc
23.8
Dichanthium annulatum (Forssk.) Stapf
PAL
Geophyte
Perennial
cc
5.7
Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.
PAL
Therophyte
annual
r
4.9
Echinochloa colona (L.) Link
PAL
Therophyte
annual
cc
2.5
Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.
PAL
Therophyte
annual
r
1.6
Eragrostis aegyptiaca (Willd.) Del.
S-Z
Therophyte
annual
c
4.1
Eragrostis cilianensis (All.) F. T. Hubb.
COSM
Therophyte
annual
c
4.1
Eragrostis japoniea (Theunb.) Tin.
PAL
Therophyte
annual
rr
2.5
Eragrostis pilosa (L.) P. Beauv.
PAL
Therophyte
annual
cc
1.6
Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeusch.
PAL
Geophyte
Perennial
cc
5.7
Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth
PAL
Geophyte
Perennial
c
2.5
Panicum coloratum L.
S-Z
Geophyte
Perennial
c
4.1
Panicum repens L.
COSM
Geophyte
Perennial
cc
6.6
Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin.ex Steud.
PAL
Geophyte/
Hydrophyte
Perennial
cc
79.5
Poa infirma kunth.
ME
Therophyte
annual
c
1.6
Polypogon monospeliensis (L.) Desf.
COSM
Therophyte
annual
cc
1.6
Polypogon viridis (Gouan) Breistr.
ME+IR-TR
Therophyte
Perennial
cul
2.5
Sorghum virgatum (Hack.) Stapf
S-Z
Geophyte/
Hydrophyte
annual
cc
1.6
Typhaceae
Typha domingensis (Pers.) Poir. Ex Steud.
PAN
Geophyte/
Hydrophyte
Perennial
cc
0.8
Hydrocharitaceae
Vallisneria spiralis L.
ME+ER-SR+S-Z
Hydrophyte
Perennial
c
1.6
3.1. Phytogeographical ffinities
The phytogeographical analysis of the 112 plant species surveyed in this study revealed that the Palaeotropical have the highest contribution (26 species: 23.2%) followed by the Cosmopolitan (19 species: 17%) and Pantropical (18 species: 16.1%). The monoregional represented by (22 species: 19.6%) of which 19 species were Sudano-Zambezian, 2 species Mediterranean and one species Saharo-Sindian. On the other hand, the bi-regional chorotype was represented by 21 species (18.8% of the total flora) of which 8 species (7.1%) Saharo-Sindian and Sudano-Zambezian, 7 species (6.3%) belonging to Sudano-Zambezian and Saharo-Sindian, 3 species (2.7%) belonging to Mediterranean-Irano-Turanian chorotype, 2 species (1.8) were belonging to Sudano-Zambezian and Mediterranean and only one species (0.9%) belonging to Mediterranean and Sudano-Zambezian chorotype. On the other hand, Pluriregional represented by 6 species (5.4%, Fig 4).
3.2. Life form spectrum (Biological spectrum of species)
Seven life forms of species were reorganized depending on the location of buds and of plants shed parts during the unfavorable season. The life-form spectrum in the present study is characteristic of an extremely arid desert region with the dominance of therophytes: Therophytes have the highest contribution and considered the most abundant life form (61 species 54%), followed by phanerophytes 18 species 16%) and Geophytes 8 species 7%), Chamaephyte (7 species 6%), Geophyte/Helophytes (4 species 4%), Geophyte/Hydrophyte (4 species 4%), Hydrophyte (5 species 4.5%), Hemicryptophyte (2 species 1.8%), Helophytes, Hydrophyte /Helophytes and parasitic represented each by (1species 1%) respectively. The majority of annuals were winter species season species; some were hot-weather species (e.g., Portulaca oleracea, Eragrostis aegyptiaca and a few were non-seasonal species responding to rainfall at any time of the year (e.g., Tribulus spp., Chenopodium murale and the occurrence of the 1 parasitic plants indicates the importance of water conservation (Fig. 5).
3.3. V. 3. Soil Characteristics of the Vegetation Clusters
Sand attains the highest percentage in cluster I and cluster XII (94.8%) and lowest value in cluster XIII (84.4%). Clay has the highest value in cluster X (5.4%) (and lowest value in cluster I (1.28%). While silt has the highest in cluster VII (10.3) and the lowest in cluster II (3.9).The minimum value of pH is attained in cluster IV, VII and XI (7.3) and the maximum in cluster I (7.85). EC has a maximum in cluster IV (1.7) mmohs/cm and a minimum in cluster I (0.35) mmohs/cm. Total dissolved salts attains the highest percentage in cluster IV (1114.6%) and lowest value in cluster IX (309.3), Calcium (Ca) attains the highest concentration in cluster I (45%) and lowest value in cluster XIII (10.0%), Mg attains the highest concentration in cluster X(23.0%) and lowest value in cluster V (9.0%).Na attains the highest concentration in cluster X(62.0 %) and lowest value in cluster II (1.1%), K attains the highest concentration in cluster IV and XIII (2.0%) and lowest value in cluster XII (0.2%), HCO3 attains the highest concentration in cluster IX (9.0%) and lowest value in cluster V (3.0%), Cl attains the highest concentration in cluster I (30.0%) and lowest value in cluster IX (5.7%) and SO4 attains the highest concentration in cluster X (75.9%) and lowest value in cluster VII (10.1%, table 2).
Table 2: The mean ± SD (Standard Deviation) of the soil characteristics of the thirteen vegetation clusters identified in Suluga and Gezel islands
Cluster
pH
TDS
E C
Physical analysis
Chemical analysis %
ppt
mmohs/cm
Silt
sand
clay
Ca
Mg
Na
K
CO3
HCO3
Cl
SO4
I
7.85
224.0
0.35
4.84
94.80
1.28
45.00
10.0
1.48
0.28
-
5.00
30.0
21.76
II
7.5
398.4
0.6
3.9
94.6
1.8
26.8
12.5
1.1
0.3
-
4.0
14.8
21.6
III
7.4
563.5
0.9
7.9
89.4
3.2
24.3
10.0
2.3
0.9
-
5.5
11.5
20.5
IV
7.3
1114.6
1.7
6.8
89.6
3.6
35.0
15.0
3.2
2.0
-
4.0
10.0
41.2
V
7.4
150.4
0.2
9.3
89.6
1.8
11.0
9.0
1.5
1.6
-
3.0
9.0
11.2
VI
7.3
299.9
0.5
7.0
90.3
2.7
18.7
17.4
18.5
0.7
-
6.6
11.4
38.3
VII
7.3
540.8
0.8
10.3
87.0
2.7
18.5
11.5
1.7
0.4
-
7.5
14.5
10.1
VIII
7.4
357.0
0.6
6.1
90.8
2.9
22.3
16.3
15.0
0.4
-
6.5
14.4
36.2
IX
7.3
309.3
0.5
5.5
93.1
1.4
24.0
16.0
1.8
0.2
-
9.0
5.7
33.7
X
7.3
448.1
0.7
7.6
87.0
5.4
13.5
23.0
62.0
1.1
-
6.3
21.5
75.9
XI
7.4
356.8
0.6
5.6
92.2
2.5
22.3
15.0
16.7
0.5
-
6.6
14.4
36.8
XII
7.5
343.5
0.5
4.4
94.8
1.6
26.3
8.7
1.4
0.2
-
4.3
18.3
13.9
XIII
7.5
806.6
1.3
8.3
84.4
7.3
10.0
15.0
4.0
2.0
-
5.0
18.0
27.5
3.4. The vegetation and Edaphic variables
The relationship between the vegetation and edaphic variables are assessed by calculating the simple linear correlation between the DCA axes that reflected the vegetation gradient and the soil variables (Table 3). The second DCA axis II correlated negatively with electric conductivity (r = - 0.75), and. On the other hand, electric conductivity correlated positively with sand (r = 0.63), and Bicarbonates (r = 0.65). Calcium correlated (r = -0.88) negatively with DCA axis II and positively with TDS (r = 0.60) and negatively with sand (r = -0.84). On the other hand, magnesium correlated positively with pH (r = 0.56) and sand (r = 0.68) and negatively with silt (r = - 0.61). Potassium correlated positively with Sodium (r = 0.82) and sulfate with pH value (r = 0.76).
Table 3. Correlation coefficient between the soil variables and DCA axes (AX1- AX3) *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01.
Variable
DCA axis
pH
TDS
EC
Silt
Sand
Ca
Mg
Na
K
HCO3
Cl
SO4
AX1
AX2
AX3
mg L-1
AX1
1
AX2
0.66**
1
AX3
-0.09
-0.12
1
pH
-0.04
-0.14
0.33
1
TDS
-0.11
-0.55
-0.31
-0.27
1
EC
-0.12
-0.57**
-0.31
-0.27
0.997**
1
Silt
0.01
-0.03
-0.04
-0.45
0.24
0.23
1
Sand
0.23
0.42
-0.01
0.45
-0.5
-0.52
-0.85**
1
Ca
-0.43
-0.76**
0.12
-0.21
0.60**
0.63**
0.44
-0.84**
1
Mg
0.31
0.16
0.01
0.56**
0.06
0.05
-0.61*
0.68*
-0.52
1
Na
-0.21
-0.22
0.13
-0.49
0.18
0.22
0.03
-0.38
0.52
-0.31
1
K
-0.23
-0.24
0.41
-0.32
-0.07
-0.05
0.10
-0.32
0.43
-0.35
0.82**
1
HCO3
-0.05
-0.53
-0.24
-0.22
0.65**
0.65**
0.53
-0.69**
0.68*
-0.35
0.15
0.08
1
CL
-0.20
0.22
0.10
-0.39
-0.15
-0.12
0.07
-0.09
-0.03
-0.11
0.47
0.24
-0.47
1
SO4
-0.30
-0.34
0.55
0.76**
-0.14
-0.14
-0.25
0.11
0.14
0.36
-0.03
0.26
-0.18
-0.19
1
4. DISCUSSION
One hundred and twelve plant species were recorded from the studied islands, representing one division Spermatophyta (Angiosperm). The angiosperms flora includes 112 species, representing 23 orders, 37 families and 90 genera; 29 families are Dicotyledonoae (78.4 %) with 76 species, and 7 families are Monocotyledonous (21.6%) with 36 species (32.1 %). In accordance to flora of the studied islands as a whole, 64 annuals (57.1%) and 48 perennials (42.9%).This trend is similar to the spectrum reported for the Nubian flora as a whole (Shaheen 2004) and for the Egyptian flora (Hassib 1951). Generally the dominance of annuals could be attributed to the fact that annuals have higher reproduction capacity, ecological amplitude, certain morphological structure and genetic flexibility under high levels of disturbance such as the agricultural practices (Frenkel 1970 and Baker 1974).
With regards to the Family the Family Poaceae has the highest contribution to the total flora (24 species: 21.4%), followed by Fabaceae (17 species15.2%), Asteraceae (12 species: 10.7%), Amaranthaeeae (5 species: 4.5%), Cyperaceae (5 species: 4.5%) and Solanaceae, (4 species: 3.6%), Convolvulaceae (4 species: 3.6%), Euphorbiaceae, Brassicaeeae, Malvaceae, Apoeynaceae and Convolvulaceae each of (3 species: 2.7%). The present study indicates that the vegetation life form spectrum of Suluga and Gezel islands reflects a typical desert flora, the greater part of species are therophytes and phanerophytes (70.5%). According to Hassib (1951), therophytes are the most common life form in the Egyptian flora. In the present study Raunkiaer system was useful in characterizing the flora of Suluga and Gezel islands. The predominance of therophytes reflects an effective strategy for avoiding water losses due to high temperature, extreme aridity and water deficiencies (Van Rooyen et al. 1990, Salem 2006 and 2016).
It is also necessary to point out that the increase in both (Fabaceae) Leguminosae and therophytes in a local flora can be considered a relative index of disturbance for Mediterranean ecosystems. The importance of the study area from a phytogeographical point of view may be due to its position in the South Eastern Desert of Egypt, which is characterized by the connection of the different phytogeographical regions: Mediterranean, Irano-Turanian, Sudano-Zambezian and the Saharo-Sidinan region Abd El-Ghani and Amer 2003 and Salem 2016). This may reflect the relatively rich floristic diversity of the Eastern Desert. On the other hand, this attributed to the fact that plants of the Saharo- Sindian species are good indicators for desert environmental conditions, while Mediterranean species stand for more mesic environment for instances. Wickens (1977) and Boulos (1997) mentioned that the Saharo- Sindian region is characterized by the presence of few endemic species and genera, and absence of endemic families.
Regarding to the phytogeographical analysis of the 112 plant species surveyed in this study revealed that the Palaeotropical have the highest contribution (26 species: 23.2%) followed by the Cosmopolitan (19 species: 17%) and Pantropical (18 species: 16.1%). The monoregional represented by (22 species: 19.6%) of which 19 species were Sudano-Zambezian, 2 species Mediterranean and one species Saharo-Sindian. On the other hand, the bi-regional chorotype was represented by 21 species (18.8% of the total flora) of which 8 species (7.1%) Saharo-Sindian and Sudano-Zambezian, 7 species (6.3%) belonging to Sudano-Zambezian and Saharo-Sindian, 3 species (2.7%) belonging to Mediterranean-Irano-Turanian chorotype, 2 species (1.8) were belonging to Sudano-Zambezian and Mediterranean and only one species (0.9%) belonging to Mediterranean and Sudano-Zambezian chorotype. On the other hand, Pluriregional represented by 6 species (5.4%,This results come in harmony with El Hadidi (1993) who concluded that the major percentage of the weed flora in Egypt is represented by the widely spread Cosmopolitan, Palaeotropical, and Pantropical taxa. furthermore Shaheen (2004), who concluded that the Sudano-Zarnbesian elements in the entire flora of the Nubia surpass that of Mediterranean ones. This tendency agrees with El Hadidi and Fayed (1994-1995), who reported that the percentages of the Sahelian and Sudanian taxa are highest in Upper Egypt while Mediterranean taxa is the lowest. This may be due to the narrow alluvial strips coupled with a hot and dry atmosphere which allow only a very limited movement of Mediterranean species to the Nubia (Shaheen 2002-a).
In Egypt, few studies were concerned with the plant life of the Riverain islands in the Upper Nile Valley; Springuel (1981) studied the natural vegetation of the islands of the first Cataract at Aswan, El-Khatib (1997) described the current and past vegetation types of Kraman Islands in the River Nile at Sohag Governorate, Mohamed and Hassan (1998) studied the plant life of sedimentary islands (43 islands) in Minya Governorate. Recently, the plant life of seven islands in the Nile stream at Aswan Governorate was studied by Hamada (2004, Sheded et al. 2014 and Badry et al. 2019). The floristic composition of Suluga and Gezel varies according to geographical locations, rock formation and weathering activities which affects the features of the surface deposits and hence the ecological relationships. The spatial distribution of plant species and communities over a small geographic area in desert ecosystems is related to heterogeneous topography and landform pattern (Kassas and Batanouny 1984). The heterogeneity of local topography, edaphic factors, microclimatic conditions lead to variation of the distributional behavior of the plant associations of the study area.
One Hundred and twelve species were recorded in the present, which contribute about 97.4% out of the 115 species recorded in the same region by (Hamada 2004), (93.3 and 80%) out of the species recorded by the (Springuel 1981, 1990, Shaheen (1987and 2002-a) Suluga and Gezel protected area. This investigation demonstrated that (+28) species (+ 20%) were lost or may be extremely very rare within 40 years. This could be due to severe environmental conditions and climate changes such as water deficiency or rainless since 1995/1996, except slightly rain events. Over-exploitation, human pressure, human constraints, are among the major reasons for the decrease of species diversity and species decline in this region (Ali et al. 2000, Salem 2006, Shaltout et al. 2010 and Salem 2016). Of the encountered species 17 species (15.2 %) are considered rare species, 14 (12.5%) very rare, 53 (47.3%) very common and 25 (22.3%) as common. This means that of all encountered species 50.0 % under critical conditions and need more efforts for conservation and special managements in Suluga and Gezel protected area.
In terms of classification, the vegetation that characterizes the study area divided into thirteen vegetation clusters. Most of the identified vegetation clusters have very much in common with that recorded in some regions of the Eastern Desert (Kassas and Zahran 1965), Western Desert (Bornkamm and Kehl 1990; Abd El-Ghani 2000a,b) along the eastern (western Mediterranean region (Ayyad and El-Ghareeb 1982) and in south Sinai region (El-Kady et al. 1998). The members of each of cluster are, in some cases, linked together by having one or more of the dominant species in common. These species are named after the dominant species as follows: Panicum coloratum. Acacia tortilis subsp. raddiana and Acacia seyal. Juncus rigidus. Fimbristylis bisumbellata. Amaranthus viridis. Mimosa pigra, and Leptadenia arborea,Acacia nilotica, Crypsis schoenoides Mimosa pigra, Amaranthus graecizans, Phoenix dactylifera, Sesbania sesban and Hyphaene thebaica. Phragmites australis, Ziziphus spina-christi, Faidherbia albida, Cynodon dactylon, Cyperus rotundus, Eragrostis cilianensis, Panicum repens and Persicaria senegalensis. Springuel (1990) reported that Phragmites australis in swampy formation of the riverain vegetation in Upper Egypt. Cyperus rotundus, Eragrostis cilianensis, Panicum repens, and Desmostachya bipinnata. It was. According to Springuel (1981), Hamada (2004) this is considered as “mosaic pattern of vegetation” in which plant aggregates grow together forming complex stands. According to (Hassan and Sheded (1995), Springuel 1981) considered, Persicaria senegalensis as one of the dominant species of the riverain swampy formation in Upper Egypt, on the other hand, Serag (1991) reported that Ceratophyllmn demersum in the Nile valley is in its occurrence all year round with vigorous growth during summer than in winter in most stands.
In accordance to sociological ranges of species only one species was recoded in one cluster (i.e.) a limited number of species have a wide ecological range and so present in many clusters. Acacia seyal presented in thirteen clusters, Faidherbia albida and Phragmites australis presented eleven clusters. On the other hand, Leptadenia arborea presented in ten clusters and. Acacia nilotica presented in nine clusters, Mimosa pigra and Desmostachya bipinnatarecorded in eight clusters.Tamarix nilotica is well represented in seven clusters. Thirteen species presented eleven clusters, three species Sesbania sesban, Cynodon dactylon and Solanum nigram are present in six clusters, four species are presented in five clusters, Seventeen species are present in three clusters, thirty species recorded in one cluster namely, and thirty seven species recorded in two clusters.
As reported above most of species have limited ecological ranges and so represented in one or a few number of clusters, on the other hand, a limited number of species have aboard range of ecological range and so presented in most of the studied clusters. (Shaltout and El sheikh 1991, Salem 2016) reported that the growth and the abundance of species are enhanced with soil variable on the other hand, plant height is an important factor in the competitive and hence the structure of vegetation (Nilsson et al 1991). Species richness is a measure of the number of species found in a sample site. Since the larger the sample, the more species we would expect to find, thus according to the Menhinick's index. The highest species richness value was recorded in cluster XI (5.29 species/site) species/sites), whereas the lowest was recorded in cluster VI (1.23 species/site) on the other according to Margalef index the highest was cluster XI (15.24 species/site) and the lowest was cluster III and V and (2.43 species/site).
Diversity is of theoretical interest because it can be related to stability, maturity, productivity, evolutionary time, predation pressure and spatial heterogeneity (Hill 1973, Abd El-Ghani and Amer 2003). (Simpson_1-D index) characterized the cluster XI and so the highest Simpson index cluster was XI = 0.98 and so as Shannon_H = 4.08. It is also of vital importance for conservation of natural communities which are increasingly threatened by human activities and natural and environmental constraints (Naveh and Whittaker 1980). Basically Shannon-Weiner H, and Margalef indices measurements showed significant differences among habitats clusters in the study area on the other hand, these results indicate that altitudinal gradient, habitat types and edaphic conditions that control soil moisture and have significant influences on species diversity (Abd El-Wahab et al. 2008). Moderate similarity between the floristic compositions the studied isalnds Suluga and Gezel (50.8 %). Due to the same environmental conditions and located in the same habitats (Gezel and Suluga are uninhabited islands, Shaheen 2002-a). A high beta diversity index indicates a low level of similarity, while a low beta diversity index shows a high level of similarity Abd El-Ghani and Amer (2003). Based on our data high level of similarity occurs between the first cataract isalnds (Suluga and Gezel.).
Soil organic matter is an indicator of changes in soil and landscape characteristics. On the other hand, the loss of organic matter because of improper soil management causes a degradation of soil structure and loss of water and nutrients available to plants and microorganisms. Once the organic carbon content falls below, about 2 % of a soil is likely to be easily eroded (Lewis and Berry 1988; Warren 2002). In Southern Italy Brandt et al. (2003) reported that areas affected by desertification possessed soils in which there was a reduced amount of soil organic carbon content (<1.5%). A resembling study was carried out on Wadi Allaqi indicated that the organic matter ranged from 0.7 to 1.5% OC. Sheded (2002) pointed out in his study on wadi Allaqi PA that the percentage values of organic matter ranged between (0.35% and 1.34%). The sand fraction was relatively high in the study area. This situation could be attributed to the physical and chemical weathering process of granite components which distinguished most of the study area, especially the Suluga I. Physical weathering is a process that breaks up and disintegrates the parent rock or primary minerals, within the study area. (Salem 2006 and Shaltout et al. 2010). Green land was changed to bare land or non-vegetation area. Generally speaking, the fieldarea or planted areas are at risk of losing vegetation or said desertification what already investigated at server portion of Suluga I and a formation of sand dunes appears and that means that land changed to no vegetation (bare land).
References
Abd El-Ghani MM (2000b). Floristic and environmental relations in two extreme desert zones of western Egypt. global ecology and biogeography, 9: 499-516 pp.
Abd El-Ghani MM and Amer WM (2003). Soil–vegetation relationships in a coastal desert plain of southern Sinai, Egypt, Journal of arid environments, 55: 607- 628pp.
Abd El-Ghani MM (2000a). Vegetation composition of Egyptian inland salt marshes. Botanical bulletin of academia sinica. 41: 305-314 pp.
Abdel Khalik K.N., El-Sheikh, M.A. and El-Aidarous A. (2013). Floristic diversity and vegetation analysis of Wadi Al-Noman, Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Turkish Journal of Botany 37: 894-907.
Abu-Al-Izz MS (1971). Land forms of Egypt. The American University in Cairo Press. Dar Al- Maaref, Cairo, 281 pp.
Ali, M. M., Hassan, S. A. and Shaheen A. M. (2011). Impacts of riparian trees shade on aquatic plants in conservation islands. Acta Botanica Croatia, 70 (2): 245-258.
Ali M. M. Hassan S. A. and Shaheen A. M. (2011). Impacts of riparian trees shade on aquatic plants in conservation islands. Acta Botanica Croatia, 70 (2): 245-258.
Ali M. M. Dickinson, G. and Murphy, K. J. (2000). Predictors of plant diversity in a hyper-arid desert wadi ecosystem. Journal of Arid Environments 45: 215- 230.
ALI M. M., Springuel, I. V. and Yacoub, H. A. 1999: Submerged plants as bio indicators for aquatic habitat quality in the River Nile. Journal of Union Arab Biologist 9 (B), 403–418.
Ali M. Amer. W. Hussein A. , (2014) Ecology and Flora of Plants of the Nile Islands in the Area between Aswan and Esna, MSc. Botany Department, Faculty of Science Aswan University, 254 pp.
Ayyad M.A., and Ghabbour S.I. (1986). Hot deserts of Egypt and Sudan. In: Evenari, M., Noy-Meir, I. and Goodall, D.W. (eds.) Ecosystems of the world, 12B, Hot Desert and Arid Shrublands, B. 149-202 pp. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Badry O. Mohamed, Tarek A. A. Radwan, Fatma A. A. Ayed and Mohamed G. Sheded (2019). Floristic Diversity of Riparian Plants in Aswan Reservoir at the Extreme South of the River Nile, Upper Egypt : A Closed Ecological System, Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, Vol. 16(3), p. 595-609
Belal, A. E. and Springuel, I. V. (1996). Economic value of plant diversity in arid environments. Nature and Resources 32: 33-39.
Bornkamm, R., Kehl, H., 1990. The plant communities of the western desert of Egypt. Phytocoenologia, 19 (2): 149-231 pp.
Boulos L. (2000 - 2005). Flora of Egypt, Vol. 1-4. Al Hadara Publishing, Cairo. Boulos, L. (2000). Flora of Egypt. Al Hadra. Publishing, Cairo, 2: 149- 150.
Boulos, L. (1995). Flora of Egypt, checklist, Al Hadara Publishing, Cairo, 285 pp.
Boulos L. (1999). Flora of Egypt, vol. 1 (Azollaceae - Oxalidaceae). Al Hadara Publishing, Cairo, 419 pp.
Boulos. L. (2000). Flora of Egypt, vol.2 (Geraniaceae- Boraginaceae). Al Hadara Publishing, Cairo, 352 pp.
Boulos. L. (2002). Flora of Egypt, vol.3 (Verbenaceae-Compositae). Al Hadara Publishing, Cairo, 373 pp.
Boulos and El Hadidi (1984). The Weed flora of Egypt, The Amer Univ. in Cairo Press, 178 pp.
Boulos L (1997). Endemic flora of the middle east and north Africa. In: Barakat HN and Hegazy AK.
Boulos L. (2005) Flora of Egypt: Vol. 4. Al-Hadara Publishing, Cairo, Egypt, 325 pp.
Brandt J, Geeson N and Imeson A (2003). A desertification indicator system for Mediterranean Europe. European commission funded research project DG-Research. Stefan sommer, EC-JRC, Ispra, Italy, 79 pp.
El Hadidi, M.N. and Ghbbour, S. (1968). Floristic study of the Nile Valley at Aswan, Rev. Zool. Bot. Africans 78: 394-407
El Hadidi, M.N. and Springuel, I. (1978). Plant life in Nubia (Egypt). I. Introduction, plant communities of the Nile islands at Aswan. Taeckholmia 9: 103-109.
EL-Hadidi, M. N. and Springuel, I. (1978). Plant life in Nubia (Egypt). Plant communities of the Nile islands at Aswan. Taeckholmia 9: 103-109.
El-Hadidi, M. N. and Fayed, A. A. (1994-1995). Materials for Excursion Flora of Egypt. Taeckholmia 15: 1-223.
El-Khatib, A. A. (1997) Former and present vegetation of Kraman Island, Upper Egypt. Arab Gulf J. Sci. Res., 15 (3), 661–682 pp.
Gaines WL, Harrod RJ and Lehmkuhl JF (1999). Monitoring Biodiversity: Quantification and interpretation. USDA Forest Service. Pacific North-west Research Station. General technical report, PNW-GTR, 443 pp.
Hamada, F. A. M. (2004) Studies on the Riverian Vegetation of some Islands at Aswan Governorate, Egypt. M. Sc. Thesis, Fac. Sci., Aswan, South Valley University, Egypt.
Hamed T., Sheded M. G. and Badry, M.O (2012) Floristic Composition of Some Riverian Islands at Qena Governorate-Egypt, Egypt. J. Bot. 2. International conference, 29- 30 April, Minia Univ., pp. 299- 322.
Hassib, M. (1951). Distribution of plant communities in Egypt. Bull. Fac. Sci. Fouad I, Cairo, Egypt, 29, 59-261.
Hill, M.O. (1979a). TWINSPAN: A FORTRAN Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in an Ordered Two-Way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Section of Ecology and Systematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Hill, M.O. (1979b). DECORANA: A FORTRAN Program: Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. Section of Ecology and Systematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Hill MO (2005). DECORANA and TWINSPAN: ordination and classification of multivariate species data: a partially revised edition, together with supporting programs, in Fortran, 77 pp.
Jackson M. L. (1977). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall of India, Private limited New Delhi, 498 pp.
Kassas M. (1955). Rainfall and vegetation in arid Northeast Africa. Plant Ecology Proc. Montpellier Symp., Paris, UNESCO, 49-57.
Kassas M. and Girgis, W. A. (1964). Habitat and plant communities in the Egyptian desert. V: The limestone plateau, Journal, of Ecology, 52: 107-119
Kassas M and Batanouny KH (1984). Plant ecology. In: cloudsley-thompson, J.J. (Ed.), sahara desert. Pergamon press, Oxford, 348 pp.
Kassas M and Girgis WA (1969). Plant life in the Nubian Desert east of the Nile. Bull. Inst. Egypte, 31: 47-71 pp.
Kassas M., Zahran, M.A., 1965. Studies on the ecology of the Red Sea coastal land. II. The district from el-galala el-qibliya to hurghada. Bulletin de la Societ de geoeographie D’Egypte, 38:155-173 pp.
Kilmer, and Alexander, (1949). Methods of making mechanical analysis of soil. Sci. 68, 15.
Krebs CJ (1989). Ecological methodology. New York: Harper and Row publishers, 550 pp.
Lewis LA and berry L (1988). African environment and resourses, Unwin Hyman, Boston. Annals of the association of American geographers, 79 (3) 471- 473 pp.
Lykke A. M. (1998). Assessment of species composition change in savanna vegetation by means of woody plants' size class distributions and local information, Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 1261±1275 pp.
Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton:
Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. (1974). Aims and Methods of vegetation Ecology. John Willey and Sons, New York.
Parmesan C (1999). Pole ward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature, 399: 579 583.
Raunkiaer C (1934). Life Forms of Plants and statistical plant geography. The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 632 pp.
Salem A H I (2006). Demographic study on the woody vegetation in wadi Allaqi, south eastern Egypt, MSc, Thesis, Faculty of Science at Aswan. South Valley University, 180 pp.
Salem A H I (2016). Assessing the role of wadi Allaqi biosphere reserve in the vegetation conservation, PhD thesis , Faculty of Science at Tanta, Tanta university, 286pp.
Shaheen A. M. (2002-b). Weed diversity of newly formed land on the southern Border of Egypt (Eastern and Western Shores of Lake Nasser). Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 5 (7): 802-806.
Shaheen, A. M. (2004) Flora of Egyptian Nubia after Aswan High Dam construction. Submitted to Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Biol. Sci. (ICBS), Fac. Sci., Tanta Uni. 28-29 April.
Shaltout K. H., Sheded, M. G, El Kady, H. F. and Al Sodany, Y. M. (2003). Phytosociology and size structure of Nitraria retusa along the Egyptian Red Sea coast. Journal of arid Environments, 53: 331- 345.
Shaltout K H, Sheded MG and Salem AH (2010). Vegetation spatial heterogeneity in a hyper and biosphere reserve area in north Africa. Acta Botanica Croatia. 69 (1): 31- 46 pp.
Sheded MG (2002) Vegetation analysis in the south eastern desert of Egypt. Journal of biological science, 2: 573-581 pp.
Sheded MG, Ahmed MK and SA Hamad (2014). Vegetation Analysis in the Red Sea-Eastern Desert Ecotone at the Area between safaga and south qusseir, Egypt. Ecologia balkanica, 6 (2) 7-24 pp.
Springuel, I. V., 1981: Studies on the natural vegetation of the islands of the First Cataract at Aswan, Egypt. PhD Thesis, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Springuel I.V (1995). Environment and producers in Wadi Allaqi ecosystems. Faculty of Science at Aswan, Assiut University. Allaqi project, working paper No. (28).
Springuel, I. V. (1987) Plant life in Nubia. V. Aquatic plants in the Egyptian Nubia. Aswan Sci. Tech. Bull., 8, 185-221.
Springuel, I., El-Hadidi, M. N., and Sheded, M. (1991). Plant communities in the southern part of the Eastern Desert (Arabian Desert) of Egypt. Journal of Arid Environments 21:307-317.
Belal A. E. and Springuel, I. V. (1997). Wadi Allaqi Biosphere Reserve. Unit of Environmental and Development, South Valley University.
Täckhlom V. (1974). Students' flora of Egypt. Second edition. Publishing by Cairo University. Printed by Cooperative Printing company, Beirut.
Thomas S.C. (1991) Population densities and patterns of habitat use among anthropoid primates of the Ituri Forest, Zaire. Biotropica 23, 68±83.
Van Rooyen MW, Theron GK and Grobbelaar N (1990). Life forms and spectra of flora of namaqualand, south Africa. Journal of arid environments, 19: 133-145 pp.
Walter H., Harnickell E. and Mueller-Dombois, D. (1975). Climate Diagram Maps. Berlin. Springer Verlag.
Ward J. V., Tockner K., Arscott D. B. and Claret C. (2002). Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biology 47: 517–539
Ward J. V., Tockner K., Arscott D. B. and Claret C. (2002). Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biology 47: 517–539
Warren A (2002). Land degradation is contextual. Land degradation and Development, 13: 449 - 459 pp.
Wickens G.E., 1977. Some of the phytogeographical problems associated with Egypt. Publications Cairo University herbarium 7&8, 223–230.
Zahran MA and Willis AJ (1992). The vegetation of Egypt. Chapman and Hall, London, 424 pp.
Zohary, M. (1973). Geo-botanical Foundations of the Middle East, 2 vols. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.